Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Manage only online cpus

[Viresh Kumar]

On 16 December 2012 18:34, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:20:08 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> cpufreq core doesn't manage offline cpus and if driver->init() has returned
>> mask including offline cpus, it may result in unwanted behavior by cpufreq core
>> or governors.
>>
>> We need to get only online cpus in this mask. There are two places to fix this
>> mask, cpufreq core and cpufreq driver. It makes sense to do this at common place
>> and hence is done in core.
>
> Well, this series makes sense to me, but I'd like to hear what the other people
> think.

That sounds great :)

Some more information for others about how i reached to these issues
is present here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/44
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/