Re: [PATCH 2/3] CLK: uninline clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable_unprepare()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Sun Dec 16 2012 - 07:20:34 EST


On 16 December 2012 17:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 05:10:36PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 20 November 2012 14:52, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > We'll need to invoke clk_disable_unprepare() via a pointer in our devm_*
>> > conversion so let's uninline the pair.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Mike, are you taking these patches?
>
> And what about my comments, some of which you've failed to reply to?

Surprised!! I thought there was nothing missing after the last
discussion i remember.
Dmitry agreed to drop the first patch and all other looked fine, as
nobody objected
to them again. Yes, you did in the beginning but there were valid
replies to them, on
which you never objected.

So, i thought its all good now. Can you point again to the issues still left ?

--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/