Re: [GIT TREE] Unified NUMA balancing tree, v3

[Rik van Riel]

On 12/10/2012 01:22 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> So autonuma and numacore are basically on the same page, with a slight
> advantage for numacore in the THP enabled case. balancenuma is closer
> to mainline than to autonuma/numacore.

Indeed, when the system is fully loaded, numacore does very well.

The main issues that have been observed with numacore are when
the system is only partially loaded. Something strange seems to
be going on that causes performance regressions in that situation.

--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/