Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: stmmac: change GMAC control register for SGMII

From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO
Date: Tue Dec 04 2012 - 07:35:12 EST


On 11/28/2012 11:57 AM, Byungho An wrote:
On 11/26/2012 07:31 PM, Giuseppe CABALLARO wrote:
On 11/23/2012 10:04 AM, Byungho An wrote:

This patch changes GMAC control register (TC(Transmit
Configuration) and PS(Port Selection) bit for SGMII.
In case of SGMII, TC bit is '1' and PS bit is 0.

IMO this new support that should be released for net-next and further
effort is actually needed.

OK, I see but if possible, I want to support the new features which is
included in this patch from v3.8

ok I agree and I can support you.


The availability of the PCS registers is given by looking at the HW
feature register. In fact, these are optional registers.
I don't want to break the compatibility with old chips.

It means that old chip doesn't have this bit or this register? If that, how
about using compatible in DT blob like snps,dwmac-3.70a and then in just
this case trying to read this bit and this register.

The driver also works on mac 10/100 Databook 2.0 that has not these registers.

I do not see why we have to use Kconfig macro to select ANE etc (as
you do in your patches).
OK. I agree with you.

we have to use the HW feature reg.


The driver could directly manage the phy device by itself if possible
and the stmmac_init_phy should be reworked.

Could you explain more detail? As I understood, after set ANE bit in MAC
side then PHY auto-negotiation can be enabled. If I'm wrong let me know.
According to your mention, MAC and PHY auto-negotiation can be managed in
stmmac_init_phy?

Currently the driver uses the Physical Abstraction Layer (PAL) to dialog with a PHY. On all the platforms supported (not only ST) we have always used it. Personally, I tested several phy devices with different MII interfaces (MII/RMII/GMII/RGMII ... ) but not TBI/RTBI/SGMII interfaces.

There are several things that need to be implemented. For example:

The ISR (e.g. priv->hw->mac->host_irq_status) should be able to manage
these new interrupts.
I think that there would be two additional interrupts."PCS Auto-Negotiation
Complete" and "PCS Link Status Changed". These two interrupts are added to
"stmmac_interrupt". In my opinion, there are no specific processing for
these two irqs. What do you think about it?

if the link changes this has to be logged in the driver.
For example, depending on the link speed on some platforms we need to call dedicated call-back to set sysconfig registers or custom clocks.

The code has to be able to maintain the user interface.
For example if you want to enable ANE or manage Advertisement caps.

Does it mean that command line or other network command(e.g. ifconfig...) or
ioctol? Actually I don't understand exact user interface way. Could you
recommend the method for user interface?

Using ethtool or mii-tool the user want to know the link status. So these kind of information have to be maintained.

Take a look at the stmmac_adjust_link that is called by the PAL.

Signed-off-by: Byungho An <bh74.an@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

[snip]

+ if (priv->phydev->interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII) {
+ value = readl(priv->ioaddr);
+ /* GMAC_CONTROL_TC : transmit config in RGMII/SGMII */
+ value |= 0x1000000;
+ /* GMAC_CONTROL_PS : Port Selection for GMII */
+ value &= ~(0x8000);
+ writel(value, priv->ioaddr);
+ }
+


This parts of code have to be moved in
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac1000_core.c

OK.

Pls, do not use value |= 0x1000000 but provide the appropriate defines.

OK.

/* Request the IRQ lines */
ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);

Thank you.

you are welcome
Peppe

Byungho An.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/