Re: [PATCH] x86, fpu: avoid FPU lazy restore after suspend

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 11/30/2012 11:41 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> Hmm... from my point of view it would almost seem saner to do this on
>> the way *up*... as part of CPU (re-)initialization.  After all, the
>> "nothing is currently running on this CPU" is part of the initial state
>> of the CPU, regardless of if we have ever been online before or not.
> 
> That works for me too, and has the similar advantage of being easier
> to think about than "the cpu is actually still being used, and we're
> playing tricks with the FPU state cache" approach.
> 
> Regardless, much credit to Vincent (and presumably others on the
> chromium team) for finding and debugging this.
> 

OK, how do you want to handle this, given that 3.7 is presumably
imminent?  We can apply Vincent's patch now, and then restructure it
later, or we can go for the gold now, but replicating the testing
Vincent has done will probably take well into next week.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/