Re: [PATCH V2 00/23] printk: refactoring

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Nov 29 2012 - 17:21:33 EST


On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:08:15 -0800
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 15:26 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:54:10 -0800
> > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 06:49 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 20:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > Make printk a bit more readable.
> > > >
> > > > Andrew? Are you going to apply this again for -next?
> > >
> > > Andrew? Any answer?
> >
> > Backlogged, not lost. Hopefully this week or next week.
> >
> > I trust it has had more thorough compilation coverage testing
> > than v1?
>
> Well, it's getting to be too late for this series.

Yeah sorry, stuff got in the way, then people patched printk.c.

> When would be the best time to resubmit and get this
> into -next?

I think at rc1. Then if all is OK I'd aim at a merge for rc2 or rc3
because these patches are rather a pain to keep alive.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/