[PATCH 7/8] srcu: update the comments of synchronize_srcu_expedited()

[Lai Jiangshan]

The new synchronize_srcu_expedited() does not use synchronize_rcu_sched_expedited(),
it removed such lock dependence.

This patch only removes this small piece of the comments:
"it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock
that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier"

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/srcu.c |   11 +++++------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/srcu.c b/kernel/srcu.c
index 55524f6..38a762f 100644
--- a/kernel/srcu.c
+++ b/kernel/srcu.c
@@ -471,12 +471,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_srcu);
  * Wait for an SRCU grace period to elapse, but be more aggressive about
  * spinning rather than blocking when waiting.
  *
- * Note that it is illegal to call this function while holding any lock
- * that is acquired by a CPU-hotplug notifier.  It is also illegal to call
- * synchronize_srcu_expedited() from the corresponding SRCU read-side
- * critical section; doing so will result in deadlock.  However, it is
- * perfectly legal to call synchronize_srcu_expedited() on one srcu_struct
- * from some other srcu_struct's read-side critical section, as long as
+ * Note that it is also illegal to call synchronize_srcu_expedited()
+ * from the corresponding SRCU read-side critical section;
+ * doing so will result in deadlock.  However, it is perfectly legal
+ * to call synchronize_srcu_expedited() on one srcu_struct from some
+ * other srcu_struct's read-side critical section, as long as
  * the resulting graph of srcu_structs is acyclic.
  */
 void synchronize_srcu_expedited(struct srcu_struct *sp)
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/