Re: [V2 PATCH 1/3] staging: ozwpan: Remove redundant null check beforekfree in ozpd.c

From: Rupesh Gujare
Date: Wed Nov 21 2012 - 08:42:51 EST


On 21/11/12 13:05, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:46:15PM +0000, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
Call kfree only if required else return from function.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rupesh Gujare <rgujare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not sure this is right.

Signed-off-by is intended to have a legal meaning that you are
signing off that you have permission to submit the patch. You're
not allowed to sign off on behalf of someone else.

If we apply this as is, then you get the author credit. If you want
to give Sachin author credit then make the first line of the email:

From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>

All right, thats my mistake. I did not understood "signed-off-by" properly . All my intention was to acknowledge original author's contribution and make changes which are good for driver code. I am more than happy to resend this patch series if I am allowed to use someone else credentials (which I felt is wrong)

Please let me know what is a best way to do it.


Also it's not a good idea to get too control freaky over this code
which is all going to have to be replaced before this can graduate
out of staging. You're just going to discourage people from
contributing if you redo all their patches. Linaro people are the
real deal and you should let them help.



Only intention to redo this patch series is that, new code implemented seems more logical to me. I welcome any criticism of code, & I am very much happy to accept any contributions, as done in past.


--
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/