[3.7-rc6] capture_free_page() frees page without accounting for them??

[Dave Hansen]

Hi Mel,

I'm chasing an apparent memory leak introduced post-3.6.  The
interesting thing is that it appears that the pages are in the
allocator, but not being accounted for:

	http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg46187.html
	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50181

I started auditing anything that might be messing with NR_FREE_PAGES,
and came across commit 1fb3f8ca.  It does something curious with
capture_free_page() (previously known as split_free_page()).

int capture_free_page(struct page *page, int alloc_order,
...
        __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));

-       /* Split into individual pages */
-       set_page_refcounted(page);
-       split_page(page, order);
+       if (alloc_order != order)
+               expand(zone, page, alloc_order, order,
+                       &zone->free_area[order], migratetype);

Note that expand() puts the pages _back_ in the allocator, but it does
not bump NR_FREE_PAGES.  We "return" alloc_order' worth of pages, but we
accounted for removing 'order'.

I _think_ the correct fix is to just:

-     __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << order));
+     __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES, -(1UL << alloc_order));

I'm trying to confirm the theory my making this happen a bit more often,
but I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes on the code in case I'm reading
it wrong.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/