Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] perf/x86: add memory profiling via PEBS Load Latency

[Stephane Eranian]

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:29:01PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(cpu-cycles,                       CPU_CYCLES              );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(instructions,             INSTRUCTIONS            );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(cache-references,         CACHE_REFERENCES        );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(cache-misses,             CACHE_MISSES            );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(branch-instructions,              BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS     );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(branch-misses,            BRANCH_MISSES           );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(bus-cycles,                       BUS_CYCLES              );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(stalled-cycles-frontend,  STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(stalled-cycles-backend,   STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND  );
>>> >> +EVENT_ATTR(ref-cycles,                       REF_CPU_CYCLES          );
>>> >
>>> > The merge_events() approach from the Haswell patches should be far cleaner
>>> >

>>> And which patch in your HSW series implements this?
>>
>> [PATCH 27/32] perf, x86: Support CPU specific sysfs events
>>
Ok, integrated that patch in my series and changed my code to use it.
It works.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/