Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] usb: dwc3-omap: Minor fixes to get dt working

[Felipe Balbi]

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:24:09PM +0530, kishon wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
> 
> On Thursday 25 October 2012 07:11 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >Hi Kishon,
> >
> >On 10/15/2012 03:27 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> >>Includes few minor fixes in dwc3-omap like populating the compatible
> >>string in a correct way, extracting the utmi-mode property properly and
> >>changing the index of get_irq since irq of core is removed from hwmod
> >>entry.
> >>Also updated the documentation with dwc3-omap device tree binding
> >>information.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c |   14 ++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
> >>index b84ddf3..10aad46 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-omap.c
> >>@@ -318,11 +318,10 @@ static int __devinit dwc3_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  	struct resource		*res;
> >>  	struct device		*dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>
> >>-	int			size;
> >>  	int			ret = -ENOMEM;
> >>  	int			irq;
> >>
> >>-	const u32		*utmi_mode;
> >>+	u32			utmi_mode;
> >>  	u32			reg;
> >>
> >>  	void __iomem		*base;
> >>@@ -336,13 +335,13 @@ static int __devinit dwc3_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>
> >>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, omap);
> >>
> >>-	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> >>+	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> >
> >Cannot you use the name of the resource to avoid that kind of trick?
> 
> *name* is mostly used when we have multiple resource of the same type
> for a single device. Previously we were clubbing wrapper resources
> and core resources in a single hwmod device, so we had to use
> different indexing.
> But with dt we have separated those under two different devices and
> hence we can always use index as '0'. But if you think we should have
> *name*, let me know, I can resend this patch :-)

since there were no more replies here, i'm assuming Benoit's happy with
Kishon's explanation. Will apply this series as is.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature