Re: [PATCH 0/3] capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2

[Pantelis Antoniou]

On Nov 5, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Grant Likely wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
> <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Assuming that we do work on a DT object format, and that the runtime resolution mechanism is approved,
>> then I agree that this part of the capebus patches can be dropped and the functionality assumed by generic
>> DT core.
>> 
>> The question is that this will take time, with no guarantees that this would be acceptable from
>> the device tree maintainers. So I am putting them in the CC list, to see what they think about it.
> 
> This is actually exactly the direction I want to go with DT, which the
> ability to load supplemental DT data blobs from either a kernel module
> or userspace using the firmware loading infrastructure.
> 
> g.

Hi Grant,

That's pretty much our use case.

Regards

-- Pantelis


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/