Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] x86: Don't clobber top of pt_regs in nested NMI

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 14:09 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:

> >>  	subq $(5*8), %rsp
> >> +	CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 5*8
> >>  
> >>  	CFI_DEF_CFA_OFFSET SS+8-RIP
> >>  end_repeat_nmi:
> >> 
> > 
> > Is that second one even needed? Or will the CFI_DEF_CFA_OFFSET SS+8-RIP
> > fix it?
> 
> Yes it will (as long as no intervening instructions get added; that's
> to say that I'd recommend removing the blank line to make clear
> that instruction and annotation belong together).

OK, will do.

Thanks!

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/