Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 31 (ehci, dbgp)

[Alan Stern]

On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:

> >>> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/12 9:39 PM >>>
> >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 11/01/12 4:28 PM >>>
> >> >Evidently we need to change your new test in
> >> >drivers/usb/early/ehci-dbgp.c to:
> >> >
> >> >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HCD_EHCI) || defined(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST)
> >> >
> >> >Upcoming changes to ehci-hcd will make this unnecessary in 3.8, but for 
> >> >now we need it.
> >> 
> >> Which tells me that the CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT version would have been
> >> the better one  (and I would favor that over the ugly variant you suggest
> >> above).
> >
> >I also suggested IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB), which is no uglier than what 
> >you submitted and would also fix this build error.  How about using it 
> >instead?
> 
> Yes, that's better. Question then is - updated original patch or incremental one?

Greg will probably want an incremental patch, because the original has 
already been merged.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/