Re: [PATCH 3/9] net: xfrm: use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper

[Herbert Xu]

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:35:46PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Shan Wei wrote:
> 
> > -
> >  	list_for_each_entry(pos, &ipcomp_tfms_list, list) {
> >  		struct crypto_comp *tfm;
> >
> >  		tfms = pos->tfms;
> > -		tfm = *per_cpu_ptr(tfms, cpu);
> > +
> > +		/* This can be any valid CPU ID so we don't need locking. */
> > +		tfm = *this_cpu_ptr(tfms);
> 
> It would be better to use
> 
> 	this_cpu_read(tfms)
> 
> since that would also make it atomic vs interrupts. The above code (both
> original and modified) could determine a pointer to a per cpu structure
> and then take an interrupt which would move the task. On return we would
> be accessing the per cpu variable of another processor.

Please refer to the comment in the patch above.

But I think the patch is wrong anyway because it would introduce
a warning, no?

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/