RE: [PATCH] To crash dump, we need keep other memory type exceptE820_RAM, because other type come from BIOS or firmware is used by othercode(for example: PCI_MMCONFIG).

From: Zhang, Jun
Date: Wed Oct 31 2012 - 22:15:42 EST


Hello, Anvin

I want to explain why I modify in this place. In kexec, it pass three parameters, memmap=exactmap memmap=544K@64K memmap=64964K@32768K
I think my patch modify the least code.
Actually, there are some choise to fix it.
1) my patch.
2) modify kexec, only pass two parameters -- memmap=544K@64K memmap=64964K@32768K, in kernel setup_memory_map, we can remove RAM range.
3) add extra optional, like memmap=REMOVERAM

Which one do you like? Maybe you have better solution, please share it.
Thanks!

Best Regards!

Jun Zhang
Inet: 8821-4273
Dir.Tel: 86-21-6116-4273
Email: jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 1:39 PM
To: Zhang, Jun
Cc: Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Morton; Fleming, Matt; Paul Gortmaker; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] To crash dump, we need keep other memory type except E820_RAM, because other type come from BIOS or firmware is used by other code(for example: PCI_MMCONFIG).

On 10/30/2012 10:22 PM, Zhang, Jun wrote:
> Hello, Anvin
> You are right. Thanks!
>
> Hello, All
> Please review it again. Thanks!
>
> From bf7506ac7e9ce0df0b915164dbb7a6d858ef2e40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: jzha144 <jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:51:18 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] When we are doing a crash dump, we still need non-E820_RAM
> memory type address information in order to do I/O. so only
> remove all RAM ranges which need to be dumped.
>
> Signed-off-by: jzha144 <jun.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c index
> df06ade..77be839 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -851,6 +851,15 @@ static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *p)
> * reset.
> */
> saved_max_pfn = e820_end_of_ram_pfn();
> +
> + /*
> + * We are doing a crash dump, so remove all RAM ranges
> + * as they are the ones that need to be dumped.
> + * We still need all non-RAM information in order to do I/O.
> + */
> + e820_remove_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM, 1);
> + userdef = 1;
> + return 0;
> #endif
> e820.nr_map = 0;
> userdef = 1;
>

The code is still wrong...

-hpa


--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

N‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶ÇvØ^–)Þ{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±‘êçzX§¶›¡Ü}©ž²ÆzÚ&j:+v‰¨¾«‘êçzZ+€Ê+zf£¢·hšˆ§~†­†Ûiÿûàz¹®w¥¢¸?™¨è­Ú&¢)ßf”ù^jÇy§m…á@A«a¶Úÿ 0¶ìh®å’i