Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] mmc: esdhc: enable polling to detect card byitself

From: Shawn Guo
Date: Wed Oct 31 2012 - 10:55:17 EST


On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 05:30:01PM +0800, yongd wrote:
> In the current code logic, sdhci_add_host() will enable the polling
> method (set MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL) for a removable card (MMC_CAP_
> NONREMOVABLE is not set) whose host's internal card detection method
> is disabled for some reason (SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION is set).
>
> However, this is improper since we can have some other card detection
> methods besides host internal card detection and polling method. For
> example, if the card detection type is ESDHC_CD_GPIO (external gpio pin
> for CD), we should keep SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION set, or host
> internal card detection interrupt will still be enabled. So, here comes
> the 1st change in this patch to keep SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION
> set for ESDHC_CD_GPIO type. But, after the 1st change, just as above
> said, sdhci_add_host() will still enable polling for such a card.This
> is redundant.
>
This actually results in an unpleasant rather than redundant behavior.
Right after this patch gets applied and before patch #3 gets applied,
driver sdhci-esdhc-imx will use polling even for ESDHC_CD_GPIO case.

> On the other hand, for the card with ESDHC_CD_NONE detection type(no CD,
> neither controller nor gpio, so use polling), we currently rely on
> sdhci_add_host() to enable polling for us.
>
> Here propose the 2nd change in this patch for such an embarrassing case.

Besides above, this is another sign that the patch (and series) should
be better partitioned.

> 1st, this patch will de-couple polling enabling with sdhci_add_host() by
> doing this in host driver itself, just as some other vendors. 2nd, one
> more patch will remove such improper MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL enabling in
> sdhci_add_host().
>
> Change-Id: Ia7525009d8fd188e3f0169f225e4a76ff9e94b47

Remove this, please.

> Signed-off-by: yongd <yongd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index effc2ac..ff201a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "request irq error\n");
> goto no_card_detect_irq;
> }
> - /* fall through */
> + break;

The current sdhci-esdhc-imx implementation clears flag
SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION even for ESDHC_CD_GPIO case
and then emulate flag SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT by reading CD gpio state in
esdhc_readl_le(). Obviously, simply setting the flag for gpio case
does not provide an equal behavior as before.

Shawn

>
> case ESDHC_CD_CONTROLLER:
> /* we have a working card_detect back */
> @@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> break;
>
> case ESDHC_CD_NONE:
> + host->mmc->caps = MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
> break;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/