On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:52:03AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:On 15.10.2012 13:09, Mel Gorman wrote:[...]On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:54:13AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:On 10/12/2012 03:57 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction only in direct reclaim
Jiri Slaby reported the following:
It's because a problem was reported related to the patch (off-list,Just wondering, is there a reason why this patch wasn't applied toYes, applying this instead of the revert fixes the issue as well.
mainline? Did it simply fall through the cracks? Or am I missing
something?
whoops). I'm waiting to hear if a second patch fixes the problem or not.
I'm asking because I think I stil see the issue onI like the steps to reproduce.
3.7-rc2-git-checkout-from-friday. Seems Fedora rawhide users are
hitting it, too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866988
Is step 3 profit?
Or are we seeing something different which just looks similar? I canIt could be the same issue. Can you test with the "mm: vmscan: scale
test the patch if it needs further testing, but from the discussion
I got the impression that everything is clear and the patch ready
for merging.
number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction only in direct reclaim"
patch and the following on top please?