Re: [PATCH 0/2] irq_work: A couple fixes

[Frederic Weisbecker]

2012/10/30 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 17:25 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
>> No I was worried about the cpu_relax() in irq_work_sync()
>
> That one is fine too, as this is the purpose of cpu_relax(). Not only to
> relax the cpu, but also to tell gcc that the loop needs to be reread.

Ok, should be fine then.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/