Re: x86: Regression in 3.6.4, bisected to "Exclude E820_RESERVEDregions..."

From: Alexander Holler
Date: Mon Oct 29 2012 - 14:10:50 EST


Am 29.10.2012 17:59, schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 02:19:32PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 29.10.2012 11:22, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Hello,

I've just bisected a problem with 3.6.4.

I had to revert commit 54ce8ce298f382a06186cb4672ad6aa090b050b6
(1bbbbe779aabe1f0768c2bf8f8c0a5583679b54a in mainline), otherwise my box
didn't boot.

I can't provide any output, because I don't see if that commit is
applied. ;)

That sentence missed an 'any'. But I've now attached a serial, here is
the output:

Thanks for this, it should be fixed in the next 3.6.y release, we needed
to add two more commits from upstream:
844ab6f993b1d32eb40512503d35ff6ad0c57030
f82f64dd9f485e13f29f369772d4a0e868e5633a
If you apply those two, and it doesn't solve the problem for you, please
let us know.

They don't applied cleanly, but after fixing the conflicts it seem's to work.

Of course, I don't know the difference with applying those two commits or reverting the commit in 3.6.4, but I assume it's better to add the two instead of reverting the one (I'm currently to lazy to read and understand the commit-messages). ;)

Thanks,

Alexander

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/