Re: Regression from 3.4.9 to 3.4.16 "stable" kernel

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Mon Oct 29 2012 - 12:37:25 EST


On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However I'm not sure that this loop is correct either. Yinghai, does
> your version definitely iterate in increasing pfn order? If not then
> the max_pfn_mapped assignment must be conditional.

yes, memblock is in order.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/