Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/mm: only do a local TLB flush in ptep_set_access_flags()

[Rik van Riel]

On 10/26/2012 03:18 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I can change the text of the changelog, however it looks
> > like do_wp_page does actually use ptep_set_access_flags
> > to set the write bit in the pte...
> >
> > I guess both need to be reflected in the changelog text
> > somehow?
>
> Yeah, and by now, after all this discussion, I suspect it should be
> committed with a comment too. Commit messages are good and all, but
> unless chasing a particular bug they introduced, we shouldn't expect
> people to read them for background information.

Now that we have the TLB things taken care of, and
comments to patches 10/31 and 26/31 have been addressed,
is there anything else that needs to be done before
these NUMA patches can be merged?

Anyone, this is a good time to speak up. We have some
time to address whatever concern you may have.

(besides waiting for the next merge window)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/