Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups

[Josh Cartwright]

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:24:16AM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> > Michal-
> >
> > Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your
> > feedback.  I've intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until
> > we figure out the appropriate way to get them in tree (feel free to
> > just apply 1-3)
>
> I am ok to pick just several patches from your patchset. But this is
> no definitely good working style. Not expert for submission process
> but I think that if there is one broken patch maintainer shouldn't
> apply it.  Can someone else check this?

It turns out that with the change to patch 5 to map the uart to a known
working address (instead of VMALLOC_END - 0x1000), patch 4 isn't needed,
and as such can be dropped.  (I didn't realize this until this morning
until I had saw you had applied 1-3,5 to your tree, but not 4).

So, for what it's worth, you've applied all of the relevant patches for
this patchset.

  Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/