Re: [PATCH v7 11/16] net,l2tp: use new hashtable implementation

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Mon Oct 29 2012 - 09:03:58 EST


* Sasha Levin (levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
[...]
> -/* Session hash global list for L2TPv3.
> - * The session_id SHOULD be random according to RFC3931, but several
> - * L2TP implementations use incrementing session_ids. So we do a real
> - * hash on the session_id, rather than a simple bitmask.
> - */
> -static inline struct hlist_head *
> -l2tp_session_id_hash_2(struct l2tp_net *pn, u32 session_id)
> -{
> - return &pn->l2tp_session_hlist[hash_32(session_id, L2TP_HASH_BITS_2)];
> -
> -}

I understand that you removed this hash function, as well as
"l2tp_session_id_hash" below, but is there any way we could leave those
comments in place ? They look useful.

> -/* Session hash list.
> - * The session_id SHOULD be random according to RFC2661, but several
> - * L2TP implementations (Cisco and Microsoft) use incrementing
> - * session_ids. So we do a real hash on the session_id, rather than a
> - * simple bitmask.

Ditto.

> - */
> -static inline struct hlist_head *
> -l2tp_session_id_hash(struct l2tp_tunnel *tunnel, u32 session_id)
> -{
> - return &tunnel->session_hlist[hash_32(session_id, L2TP_HASH_BITS)];
> -}
> -
> /* Lookup a session by id
> */

Thanks,

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/