Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] update mem= option's spec according to its implementation

[richard -rw- weinberger]

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and
> implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working
> for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So
> we should update the specification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sort-of-tentatively-acked-by: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>

So, is this an ACK or not?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/