Re: [ 60/85] xtensa: add missing system calls to the syscall table

[Chris Zankel]

Hi Ben,


On 10/27/2012 11:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 17:06 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> [...]
>>  #define __NR_available287			287
>> -__SYSCALL(287, sys_faccessat, 0)
>> +__SYSCALL(287, sys_ni_syscall, 0)
> [...]
>
> Why was this one un-plumbed rather than properly numbered (#define
> __NR_faccessat)?
I can only speculate, that this was probably a copy/paste error that has been there for a long time. __NR_faccessat is (and was) defined as number 301. Given that 287 was never defined, it's save to
fix the table entry and set it to sys_ni_syscall.

unistd.h:
[...]
#define __NR_faccessat                          301
__SYSCALL(301, sys_faccessat, 4)
[...]

Thanks,
-Chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/