Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 11:37:13 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 October 2012 14:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 20 October 2012 01:42, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative
> >> governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of
> >> code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which
> >> increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage.
> >>
> >> This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to
> >> cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues.
> >>
> >> This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> For everybody else, this patch is already pushed by Rafael in his linux-next
> branch.

Well, not yet, although I'm going to do that.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/