Re: [PATCH v3] pwm: vt8500: Update vt8500 PWM driver support

From: Tony Prisk
Date: Wed Oct 24 2012 - 13:35:28 EST


On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 07:41 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 04:46:58PM +1300, Tony Prisk wrote:
> > This patch updates pwm-vt8500.c to support devicetree probing and
> > make use of the common clock subsystem.
> >
> > A binding document describing the PWM controller found on
> > arch-vt8500 is also included.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v2/v3:
> > Fix errors/coding style as pointed out by Thierry Reding.
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/vt8500-pwm.txt | 17 ++++
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-vt8500.c | 86 ++++++++++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/vt8500-pwm.txt
>
> Looking real good now. One last comment though and I think I'm ready to
> take this...
>
> > + err = clk_enable(vt8500->clk);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + dev_err(chip->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + };
>
> Why do you return EBUSY instead of err?

Because I didn't notice this when I 'fixed' it - I changed the other one
to return err/ret, missed this one. Will fix.
>
> Thierry
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/