Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Fix a buffer overrun in bio_integrity_split()

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Tejun" == Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Tejun> If Martin is happy with it, I'm not gonna push it but putting the
Tejun> respective storage member after one containing vararray at the
Tejun> end is a legit way to allocate the area statically. As long as
Tejun> the storage field is marked as such and not accessed directly, it
Tejun> doesn't matter whether there's padding inbetween or not. 

The embedded array is still at the end. Kent just added an explicit
pointer for use in the bio_pair corner case.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/