Re: [PATCH 0/2] struct pid-ify autofs4

[Miklos Szeredi]

> Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Yeah, the problem with that is that "autofs doesn't work if containers
> > are used" is ill defined since there are use cases where it does, I
> > believe. At the very least, ill defined in my view of things.

Customer says:

 "There is no interaction between host and the conatainer.  The host use
  only his own automount and each containers used automount in their
  container."

I think it's a pretty clearly defined use case.  And one which automount
could easily support since the only requirement is that all namespaces
are treated equally.

But I agree that adding safeguards against cases which don't have such
easily defined semantics (such as triggers from several different
namespaces).

I'll post updated patches.

Thanks,
Miklos

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/