Re: [PATCH 1/2] slab: commonize slab_cache field in struct page

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Wed Oct 24 2012 - 04:58:31 EST


On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Right now, slab and slub have fields in struct page to derive which
> cache a page belongs to, but they do it slightly differently.
>
> slab uses a field called slab_cache, that lives in the third double
> word. slub, uses a field called "slab", living outside of the
> doublewords area.
>
> Ideally, we could use the same field for this. Since slub heavily makes
> use of the doubleword region, there isn't really much room to move
> slub's slab_cache field around. Since slab does not have such strict
> placement restrictions, we can move it outside the doubleword area.
>
> The naming used by slab, "slab_cache", is less confusing, and it is
> preferred over slub's generic "slab".
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/