[PATCH 4/2] numa, mm: Rename the PROT_NONE fault handling functions

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > I don't much care either way, but I was thinking walken 
> > > might want to use something similar to do WSS estimation, 
> > > in which case the NUMA name is just as wrong.
> > 
> > That's a good point. I had not considered other uses of the 
> > same code.
> 
> Renaming the functions for more clarity still makes sense IMO: 
> we could give it a _wss or _working_set prefix/postfix?

So, to not drop your patch on the floor I've modified it as per 
the patch below.

The _wss() names signal that these handlers are used for a 
specific purpose, they are not related to the regular PROT_NONE 
handling code.

Agreed?

Thanks,

	Ingo

--------------->