Re: [PATCH v3 resend] USB: PHY: Re-organize Tegra USB PHY driver

[Stephen Warren]

On 10/19/2012 09:35 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 04:08:05PM +0530, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>> NVIDIA produces several Tegra SoCs viz Tegra20, Tegra30 etc. In
>> order to support USB PHY drivers on these SoCs, existing PHY
>> driver is split into SoC agnostic common USB PHY driver and
>> Tegra20-specific USB phy driver. This will facilitate easy
>> addition and deletion of phy drivers for Tegra SoCs.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I was reading this "driver" more closely and I have a bunch of
> questions about it, but the most important of all of them is: "why
> isn't that a real PHY driver ?". It doesn't have a probe()
> function, it doesn't use struct usb_phy to represent the PHY, it
> has a bunch of tegra-specific APIs and we can't let those
> continue.

One question here: If the PHY "driver" API changes, there will need to
be a bunch of ehci-tegra.c changes too. Will you take all those
through the PHY tree? If you expect to do that, then I'd like to
request you also take:

usb: host: tegra remove include of <mach/iomap.h>
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg72429.html

... since that should get merged before any large changes to
ehci-tegra.c; it's the EHCI equivalent of the PHY patch you already
merged.

(The same request applies to put that into a branch I can pull into
the Tegra tree as a basis for cleanup in the Tegra tree)

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/