Re: [PATCH] pstore/ram: fix undefined usage of rounddown_pow_of_two.

From: Kees Cook
Date: Fri Oct 19 2012 - 12:03:03 EST


On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> record_size / console_size / ftrace_size can be 0 (this is how you
> disable the feature), but rounddown_pow_of_two(0) is undefined. This problem
> has been present since commit 1894a253 (ramoops: Move to fs/pstore/ram.c).
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> fs/pstore/ram.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 1a4f6da..0c2ae26 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -374,10 +374,14 @@ static int __devinit ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto fail_out;
> }
>
> - pdata->mem_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(pdata->mem_size);
> - pdata->record_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(pdata->record_size);
> - pdata->console_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(pdata->console_size);
> - pdata->ftrace_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(pdata->ftrace_size);
> + if (pdata->mem_size)
> + pdata->mem_size = rounddown_pow_of_two(pdata->mem_size);

Nice catch!

Instead of the == 0 check, what about using !is_power_of_2(size) ?

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/