Re: [Xen-devel] Is: axe read_tscp pvops call. Was: Re: [RFC] ACPIS3 and Xen (suprisingly small\!).

[David Vrabel]

On 18/10/12 18:42, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> As for 'perf', since Xen already provides a virtual PMU for HVM guests
>> It's not clear why we would spend the effort to implement another
>> mechanism for PV guests (instead of using the virtual PMU from a PVH guest).
> 
> Would that allow one to evaluate the performance/bottlenecks that the
> hypervisor might have?

Not right now, no. But I don't so why it couldn't be possible.

David

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/