Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: vexpress: Add missing n_voltages setting

[Pawel Moll]

On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 04:26 +0100, Axel Lin wrote:
> I don't have a chance to compile test this patch because I could not
> find VEXPRESS_CONFIG in current tree.
> Can you help testing this patch?

I'll be more than happy to help, but can you please tell me what use
case you have in mind? The "reg->desc.continuous_voltage_range = true;"
together with this patch:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git;a=commitdiff;h=bd7a2b600ace90c8819495b639a744c8f5c68feb

were supposed to make the n_voltages unnecessary, as this regulator is
(in theory at least) capable of setting any voltage in the constraints
range, so there are not real operating points.

Cheers!

PaweÅ


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/