Re: [PATCH 13/13] drivers/media/tuners/e4000.c: use macros for i2c_msginitialization

[Ryan Mallon]

On 08/10/12 08:39, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 20:56 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> Some people thought that it would be nice to have the macros rather than
>>>> the inlined field initializations, especially since there is no flag for
>>>> write.  A separate question is whether an array of one element is useful,
>>>> or whether one should systematically use & on a simple variable of the
>>>> structure type.  I'm open to suggestions about either point.
>>>
>>> I think the macro naming is not great.
>>>
>>> Maybe add DEFINE_/DECLARE_/_INIT or something other than an action
>>> name type to the macro names.
>>
>> DEFINE and DECLARE usually have a declared variable as an argument, which 
>> is not the case here.
>>
>> These macros are like the macros PCI_DEVICE and PCI_DEVICE_CLASS.
> 
> I understand that.
> 
>> Are READ and WRITE the action names?  They are really the important 
>> information in this case.
> 
> Yes, most (all?) uses of _READ and _WRITE macros actually
> perform some I/O.

Well, they are describing an IO operation even if they don't perform it
directly. What else would you call them? I think the macro names are
fine as is.

~Ryan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/