Re: Re: 3.4.10 i915 [GM45] regression

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun Oct 07 2012 - 09:46:09 EST


On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 08:16 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> I think the conclusion looking at the bug report
> >> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54575) is
> >> that the commit 0d8957c8a90bbb5d34fab9a304459448a5131e06 should be
> >> reverted on 3.4, please correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > Daniel, do you agree with this?
>
> Yeah, seems like the sanest thing to do given the situation and lack
> of any understanding what's actually going on.

So presumably this will also need to be reverted for 3.0 and 3.2? Or is
there something very weird about i915 in 3.4?

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
You can't have everything. Where would you put it?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part