Re: [PATCH] rcu: Remove rcu_switch()

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Wed Oct 03 2012 - 16:05:38 EST


On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:39:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 08:21:52PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > It's only there to call rcu_user_hooks_switch(). Let's
> > just call rcu_user_hooks_switch() directly, we don't need this
> > function in the middle.
>
> Hello, Frederic!
>
> Doesn't this also require an empty definition of rcu_user_hooks_switch()
> to handle the CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS=n case? Or is there already such
> a definition that I am too blind to see?

There is, look below:

>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 2 ++
> > include/linux/sched.h | 8 --------
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 7c968e4..5d009de 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -204,6 +204,8 @@ static inline void rcu_user_enter(void) { }
> > static inline void rcu_user_exit(void) { }
> > static inline void rcu_user_enter_after_irq(void) { }
> > static inline void rcu_user_exit_after_irq(void) { }
> > +static inline void rcu_user_hooks_switch(struct task_struct *prev,
> > + struct task_struct *next) { }

Here.

> > #endif /* CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/