Re: [PATCH 02/15] cfq-iosched: More renaming to better representwl_class and wl_type

[Vivek Goyal]

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:50:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Also at places I have got rid of keyword "serving" as it is obivious.
> 
> I don't agree with getting rid of serving.  After your patch, it looks
> as though a cfqd has a static workload class and type.  It reads better
> to me the way it is.

It is also about the length of name. To me now a days CFQ code looks
pretty messy with very long names or lines at many a places.

So yes, "cfqd->serving_wl_class" and "cfqd->serving_wl_type" is more
readable than "cfqd->wl_class" and "cfqd->wl_type". But it also 
increases the string length significantly.

I don't know. Some of the strings seem too long and code spills into
multiple lines for a single statement.

Anyway, for this I guess I will retain "serving" keyword.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/