Re: [PATCH 0/3] Virtual huge zero page

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Oct 01 2012 - 13:33:08 EST


On 10/01/2012 10:26 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
>> It is well known that microbenchmarks can be horribly misleading. What
>> led to Kirill investigating huge zero page in the first place was the
>> fact that some applications/macrobenchmarks benefit, and I think those
>> are the right thing to look at.
>
> The whole point of the two microbenchmarks was to measure the worst
> cases for both scenarios and I think that was useful. Real life using
> zero pages are going to be somewhere in that range.
>

... and I think it would be worthwhile to know which effect dominates
(or neither, in which case it doesn't matter).

Overall, I'm okay with either as long as we don't lock down 2 MB when
there isn't a huge zero page in use.

-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/