Re: [ 173/262] mutex: Place lock in contended state afterfastpath_lock failure

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Fri Sep 28 2012 - 17:27:23 EST


On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:16:28PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 03:26:40PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > 3.5-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > >
> > > > ------------------
> > > >
> > > > From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > commit 0bce9c46bf3b15f485d82d7e81dabed6ebcc24b1 upstream.
> > >
> > > Now that you've queued this one, could you pick up a76d7bd96d as well
> > > please?
> >
> > Sure, for just 3.5.y or any other stable trees?
>
> Any other stable tree where commit 0bce9c46bf has also been merged.

Ok, now applied to 3.0.y and 3.4.y and 3.5.y

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/