Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: clarify idle vs sleep states

[Stephen Warren]

On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This pure documentation fix tries to align the "idle" and
> "sleep" pin states to the idle and suspend states from
> runtime PM.
> 
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - I changed my mind slightly after experimentation in practice
>   (empirical stuff is the best). So now I think "idle" is for
>   runtime_suspend(), and "sleep" is for suspend() proper. This
>   works best in practice for us. I'm trying to set some model
>   here that will be easy to understand and usable for typical
>   cases.

Yes, I think this makes sense.

Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/