Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional

[Mel Gorman]

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:56:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be
> defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK,
> which is conditional to KMEMCHECK.
> 
> This simple patch makes it unconditional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/