Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 06/17] ARM: LPAE: use signed arithmetic formask definitions

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Mon Sep 24 2012 - 09:54:48 EST


On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:56:04AM -0400, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> This patch applies to PAGE_MASK, PMD_MASK, and PGDIR_MASK, where forcing
> unsigned long math truncates the mask at the 32-bits. This clearly does bad
> things on PAE systems.
>
> This patch fixes this problem by defining these masks as signed quantities.
> We then rely on sign extension to do the right thing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/page.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> index ecf9019..1e0fe08 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
> /* PAGE_SHIFT determines the page size */
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 12
> #define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> -#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
> +#define PAGE_MASK (~((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1))

It's strange. Every other platform in the kernel, including those with
PAE, manage to get away with defining PAGE_MASK as the original above
(see asm-generic/pgtable.h) Why is ARM any different?

Note that PAGE_MASK gets used at the moment on ARM for both virtual and
physical addresses. x86 has PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK for masking physical
addresses. Maybe we should adopt the same approach?

Whatever, I feel that we should not deviate from the established
definitions across every other architecture.

>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> index b249035..ae39d11 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h
> @@ -48,16 +48,16 @@
> #define PMD_SHIFT 21
>
> #define PMD_SIZE (1UL << PMD_SHIFT)
> -#define PMD_MASK (~(PMD_SIZE-1))
> +#define PMD_MASK (~((1 << PMD_SHIFT) - 1))
> #define PGDIR_SIZE (1UL << PGDIR_SHIFT)
> -#define PGDIR_MASK (~(PGDIR_SIZE-1))
> +#define PGDIR_MASK (~((1 << PGDIR_SHIFT) - 1))
>
> /*
> * section address mask and size definitions.
> */
> #define SECTION_SHIFT 21
> #define SECTION_SIZE (1UL << SECTION_SHIFT)
> -#define SECTION_MASK (~(SECTION_SIZE-1))
> +#define SECTION_MASK (~((1 << SECTION_SHIFT) - 1))

These masks are applied to a _virtual_ kernel address, not the physical
addresses, Even with LPAE, the virtual address space is still 32-bit.

So this is definitely wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/