Re: [RFC] tty: Add get- ioctls to fetch tty status

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:09:53PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 01:52:32AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 12:11:44AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sysfs is one value per file, you have three values here, please make 3
> > > > files.
> > > > 
> > > > And document them in Documentation/ABI/.
> > > 
> > > Hmm, sure Greg, I'll update. Thanks!
> > 
> > Something like below I suppose? Look, if there will be no complains
> > on tech aspects on the patch (locking and tty refs) -- I'll update
> > Documentation. Just want be sure I've made no mistakes here.
> > 
> > Another question -- would not it be worth to wrap code with
> > CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE?
> 
> Alan's point stands, what's the use of this if it can instantly change
> after you read the value?

We use it when we do a checkpoint, ie when tasks are stopped. I think it's
close to data obtained from procfs (ie valid once you read it but can be
changed right after that operation). Maybe I should put everything to
procfs, or stick back with ioctl calls?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/