Re: [RFC] status of execve() work - per-architecture patches solicited

[Greg Ungerer]

On 09/22/2012 04:39 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:26:36PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > Here are a set of c6x patches to work with your experimental-kernel_thread
> > branch.
> >
> > Mark Salter (3):
> >    c6x: add ret_from_kernel_thread(), simplify kernel_thread()
> >    c6x: switch to generic kernel_execve
> >    c6x: switch to generic sys_execve
>
> Applied and pushed...
>
> FWIW, the current status:
>
> alpha - done, tested on hardware
> arm - done, tested on qemu
> c6x - done by maintainer
> frv - done, untested
> m68k - done, tested on aranym; there's a known issue in copy_thread() in
> case of coldfire-MMU, presumably to be handled in m68k tree (I can do it
> in this one instead, if m68k folks would prefer it that way)

I sent the patch to the m68k-linux list. Its been acked by Geert.

 http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=134742688015639&w=2

I was going to push it through the m68knommu git tree, but I don't mind
if you would rather take it with your changes.

Regards
Greg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/