Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tracing,x86: add a TSC trace_clock

From: David Sharp
Date: Thu Sep 20 2012 - 18:53:57 EST

Next message: Anton Vorontsov: "Re: [PATCH] pstore: avoid recursive spinlocks in theoops_in_progress case"
Previous message: David Miller: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree(net-next tree related)"
In reply to: David Sharp: "[PATCH v3 3/3] tracing: format non-nanosec times from tsc clock without a decimal point."
Next in thread: David Sharp: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tracing,x86: add a TSC trace_clock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Looks useful and good otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks! Updated with all your comments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Anton Vorontsov: "Re: [PATCH] pstore: avoid recursive spinlocks in theoops_in_progress case"
Previous message: David Miller: "Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree(net-next tree related)"
In reply to: David Sharp: "[PATCH v3 3/3] tracing: format non-nanosec times from tsc clock without a decimal point."
Next in thread: David Sharp: "Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tracing,x86: add a TSC trace_clock"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]