Re: [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: Do not setup ->active_uprobe/stateprematurely

From: Srikar Dronamraju
Date: Thu Sep 20 2012 - 10:00:23 EST


* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> [2012-09-14 19:15:54]:

> handle_swbp() sets utask->active_uprobe before handler_chain(),
> and UTASK_SSTEP before pre_ssout(). This complicates the code
> for no reason, arch_ hooks or consumer->handler() should not
> (and can't) use this info.
>
> Change handle_swbp() to initialize them after pre_ssout(), and
> remove the no longer needed cleanup-utask code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 9 +++------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 760acc1..9893cba 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1496,22 +1496,19 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (!utask)
> goto cleanup_ret;
> }
> - utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
> +
> handler_chain(uprobe, regs);
> if (uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP && can_skip_sstep(uprobe, regs))
> goto cleanup_ret;
>
> - utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
> if (!pre_ssout(uprobe, regs, bp_vaddr)) {
> arch_uprobe_enable_step(&uprobe->arch);
> + utask->active_uprobe = uprobe;
> + utask->state = UTASK_SSTEP;
> return;
> }
>
> cleanup_ret:
> - if (utask) {
> - utask->active_uprobe = NULL;
> - utask->state = UTASK_RUNNING;
> - }
> if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP))
>
> /*

Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/