Re: [PATCH] arm: introduce a DTS for Xen unprivileged virtualmachines

From: Pawel Moll
Date: Thu Sep 20 2012 - 06:06:04 EST


Morning,

On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 18:44 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"

Any particular reason to include skeleton? And I think it would be
better to use #address-cells = <2> and #size-cells = <2>, to be ready
for LPAE addresses...

> +/ {
> + model = "XENVM-4.2";
> + compatible = "xen,xenvm-4.2", "arm,vexpress";
> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> + chosen {
> + bootargs = "earlyprintk console=hvc0 root=/dev/xvda init=/sbin/init";
> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu@0 {
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
> + reg = <0>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + memory {

Formally, it should be memory@80000000, not that I have any strong
feelings about it :-)

> + device_type = "memory";
> + reg = <0x80000000 0x08000000>;
> + };
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller@2c001000 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <0>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0x2c001000 0x1000>,
> + <0x2c002000 0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + timer {
> + compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> + interrupts = <1 13 0xf08>,
> + <1 14 0xf08>,
> + <1 11 0xf08>,
> + <1 10 0xf08>;
> + };
> +
> + hypervisor {
> + compatible = "xen,xen-4.2", "xen,xen";
> + reg = <0xb0000000 0x20000>;
> + interrupts = <1 15 0xf08>;
> + };

Is this binding documented somewhere - I mean in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings?

> + motherboard {
> + arm,v2m-memory-map = "rs1";
> + ranges = <0 0 0x08000000 0x04000000>,
> + <1 0 0x14000000 0x04000000>,
> + <2 0 0x18000000 0x04000000>,
> + <3 0 0x1c000000 0x04000000>,
> + <4 0 0x0c000000 0x04000000>,
> + <5 0 0x10000000 0x04000000>;
> +
> + interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 63>;
> + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 &gic 0 0 4>,
> + <0 0 1 &gic 0 1 4>,
> + <0 0 2 &gic 0 2 4>,
> + <0 0 3 &gic 0 3 4>,
> + <0 0 4 &gic 0 4 4>,
> + <0 0 5 &gic 0 5 4>,
> + <0 0 6 &gic 0 6 4>,
> + <0 0 7 &gic 0 7 4>,
> + <0 0 8 &gic 0 8 4>,
> + <0 0 9 &gic 0 9 4>,
> + <0 0 10 &gic 0 10 4>,
> + <0 0 11 &gic 0 11 4>,
> + <0 0 12 &gic 0 12 4>,
> + <0 0 13 &gic 0 13 4>,
> + <0 0 14 &gic 0 14 4>,
> + <0 0 15 &gic 0 15 4>,
> + <0 0 16 &gic 0 16 4>,
> + <0 0 17 &gic 0 17 4>,
> + <0 0 18 &gic 0 18 4>,
> + <0 0 19 &gic 0 19 4>,
> + <0 0 20 &gic 0 20 4>,
> + <0 0 21 &gic 0 21 4>,
> + <0 0 22 &gic 0 22 4>,
> + <0 0 23 &gic 0 23 4>,
> + <0 0 24 &gic 0 24 4>,
> + <0 0 25 &gic 0 25 4>,
> + <0 0 26 &gic 0 26 4>,
> + <0 0 27 &gic 0 27 4>,
> + <0 0 28 &gic 0 28 4>,
> + <0 0 29 &gic 0 29 4>,
> + <0 0 30 &gic 0 30 4>,
> + <0 0 31 &gic 0 31 4>,
> + <0 0 32 &gic 0 32 4>,
> + <0 0 33 &gic 0 33 4>,
> + <0 0 34 &gic 0 34 4>,
> + <0 0 35 &gic 0 35 4>,
> + <0 0 36 &gic 0 36 4>,
> + <0 0 37 &gic 0 37 4>,
> + <0 0 38 &gic 0 38 4>,
> + <0 0 39 &gic 0 39 4>,
> + <0 0 40 &gic 0 40 4>,
> + <0 0 41 &gic 0 41 4>,
> + <0 0 42 &gic 0 42 4>;
> + };
> +};

You've lost me here... You have ranges and interrupt map, but don't
include motherboard file. Is it a mistake? If not, you could remove the
ranges and interrupt-map, but where do you get your peripherals from
then?

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Makefile.boot b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Makefile.boot
> index 318d308..5c633c5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Makefile.boot
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Makefile.boot
> @@ -7,4 +7,5 @@ initrd_phys-y := 0x60800000
> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VEXPRESS_DT) += vexpress-v2p-ca5s.dtb \
> vexpress-v2p-ca9.dtb \
> vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1.dtb \
> - vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb
> + vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7.dtb \
> + vexpress-xenvm-4.2.dtb

Cheers!

Pawel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/